Miscelánea > OFF-TOPIC

¿ Que opinais de la version OFICIAL del 11s ?

<< < (56/108) > >>

YONKOTROTER: --- Cita de: ink en 03/07/08, 00:58:13 am --- --- Citar ---8- como se cae el edificio ala velocidad de la luz !!!! sin oponer ninguna resistencia ... --- Fin de la cita --- podemos ir a la velocidad de la luz sin poner resistencia, entonces que mierda hacemos todabia usando coches y aviones tan lentos, lol --- Citar ---12- JAJAJAJAJA ya veo el video YAAAAAAAAA . I EL avion???? aver es el pentagono el lugar mas vigilado del mundo !!!!! i no tiene 1 puto video dond salga el avion??? --- Fin de la cita --- el "avion" es la mancha esa gris. decias que no existia video del impacto y ahi esta, haber especificado en su momento ahora no desvies las preguntas. --- Citar ---13. ohhhhhhhh si 1 rueda , dspues de aver desalojado a todo cristo al otro lado del puente ace 1 foto a 1 ruda i a 1 --- Fin de la cita --- si, una rueda, no NADA, una rueda no es NADA. --- Fin de la cita --- 8- cuenta cuento tardan en caer las torres , si tiras 1 pelota caera en el mismo tiempo , i eso se llama caida libre , imposible , al menos que no ofrezca ninguna resistencia 12- manCha ..... misil , pajaro k pasaba x alli , etc etc etc ect ect 13- de 1 avion 1 rueda ??? solo ???? manipulacion de objectos claramente puestos , es mas lo ultimo que he visto i que no me lo creo es coche bomba ......... eso seria rizar el rizo NO me lo CREO

YONKOTROTER: --- Citar ---vamos 20 incognitas que pasaron ese dia , i que a dia de hoi siguen sin tener respuesta claro o logica --- Fin de la cita --- no tendrán explicación lógica para una persona que no utilice la lógica. --- Citar ---i que cada acto que sucedio no tiene ninguna explicacion logica o son 1 cumulo de imposibles que sucedieron ese dia !!!! --- Fin de la cita --- si son un cumulo de cosas imposibles como es que son hechos? no será que lo que estas diciendo no tiene ni pies ni cabeza. [/quote] si  tienen 1 explicacion toda la CONSPIRACION las cosas imposibles no se pueden suceder , es como decirte yo vole i 1 puta cadena de tv salga i diga si puede volar , te pongan 1 imagenes trucadas i te lo creas, entoces pensaras k a sucedido

YONKOTROTER: --- Cita de: ink en 27/04/08, 20:36:08 pm ---aporto un documento de 43paginas escrito por cientificos que han investigado el colapso de las torres gemelas y del wtc7. http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/SEJonesWTCpaperSpanish62M.pdf Baker, Jeremy (2005). "Contrary to Popular (Mechanics’) Belief," Global Outlook, Issue 10, p. 14 (Spring-Summer 2005). Barnett, J. R., Biederman, R.R. and R.D. Sisson, Jr., "An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel from WTC Building 7," Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 53/12:18 (2001). Bazant, Z. P. and Zhou, Y. (2002). "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Simple Analysis," J. Eng. Mech. 128:2, January 2002. Bazant, Z. P. and Zhou, Y. (March 2002). "Addendum to ‘Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Simple Analysis," J. Eng. Mech. 128:369, March 2002. Bollyn, Christopher (2002). American Free Press, September 3, 2002, available at: http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic_.html. Chertoff, B., et al. (2005). "9/11: Debunking the Myths," Popular Mechanics, March 2005. Commission (2004). The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, Authorized Edition, New York: W.W. Norton. Cote, A. E., editor, Fire Protection Handbook 17th Edition, Quincy, Maine: National Fire Protection Association, 1992. De Grand Pre, Donn (2002). "Many Questions Still Remain About Trade Center Attack," American Free Press, February 3, 2002, available at: http://www.americanfreepress.net/02_03_02/Trade_Center_Attack/trade_center_attack.html Dwyer, James (2005). "City to Release Thousands of Oral Histories of 9/11 Today," New York Times, August 12, 2005, with quotes of eyewitnesses available in New York Times archives at http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histor ies_01.html and http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_h istories_full_01.html. Eagar, T. W. and Musso, C. (2001). "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation", Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 53/12:8- 11 (2001). FEMA (2002). "World Trade Center Building Performance Study," released May 2002, available at: http://www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm. Field, Andy (2004). "A Look Inside a Radical New Theory of the WTC Collapse," Fire/Rescue News, February 7, 2004. Available at http://cms.firehouse.com/content/article/article.jsp?sectionId=46&id=25807 Glanz, James (2001). "Engineers are baffled over the collapse of 7 WTC; Steel members have been partly evaporated," New York Times, November 29. 2001. Glanz, James, and Lipton, Eric (2002). "Towers Withstood Impact, but Fell to Fire, Report Says," Fri March 29, 2002, New York Times. Glover, Norman (2002). Fire Engineering journal, October 2002. Greening, Frank (2006), unpublished. Available at: http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf. Griffin, David Ray (2004). The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11, Northampton, Massachusetts: Interlink. Griffin, David Ray (2005). The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, Northampton, Massachusetts: Interlink. See also papers here: www.st911.org . Harris, Tom (2000). "How Building Implosions Work," available at: http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion.htm, ca. 2000. Hoffman, James (2005). "Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth," Global Outlook, Issue 10, p. 21 (Spring-Summer 2005). Hufschmid, Eric (2002). Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack, Goleta, California: Endpoint Software. Jones, S. E., et al. (2006). "Experiments Testing Greening’s Hypothesis Regarding Molten Aluminum," in preparation. Lane, B., and Lamont, S. (2005). "Arup Fire’s presentation regarding tall buildings and the events of 9/11," ARUP Fire, April 2005. Available at: http://www.arup.com/DOWNLOADBANK/download353.pdf Manning, William (2002). "Selling out the investigation," Editorial, Fire Engineering, January 2002. Manning, William (2004). "The Tainted Brush of 9/11 Politics," Editorial, Fire Engineering, September 2004. Meyer, Peter (2005). "Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11," http://serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm, March 2005. Mooney, Chris (2005). The Republican War on Science, New York, NY: Basic Books. NIST (2005). http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1Draft.pdf ("Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers (Draft)"), Sept.- Oct. 2005. NISTb (2005). http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20- %20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf (Part IIC — WTC 7 Collapse, preliminary), 2005. NOVA (2002). "Why the Towers Fell," originally broadcast Tuesday, April 30, 2002; see http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/. Parker, Dave (2005). "WTC investigators resist call for collapse visualisation," New Civil Engineer, October 6, 2005. Paul, Don, and Hoffman, Jim (2004). Waking Up From Our Nightmare : The 9/11/01 Crimes in New York City, San Francisco: Irresistible/Revolutionary. Penn Arts and Sciences (2002). Penn Arts and Sciences, summer 2002 , available at http://www.sas.upenn.edu/sasalum/newsltr/summer2002/k911.html. Risen, James (2001). "Secretive CIA Site in New York Was Destroyed on Sept. 11," New York Times, November 4, 2001. Ryan, Kevin (2004). Letter to Frank Gayle, available at http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451. Ryan, Kevin (2005). "A Call for a Personal Decision," Global Outlook, Issue 10, p. 96 (Spring- Summer 2005). See also papers here: www.st911.org . Swanson, Gail (2003). Behind the Scenes: Ground Zero, World Trade Center, September 11, 2001, New York: TRAC Team, Inc., 2003. Walsh, Trudy (2002), "Handheld APP eased recovery tasks," GCN, 9/11/02 issue. Williams, James (2001). "WTC a structural success," SEAU NEWS; The Newsletter of the Structural Engineers Association of Utah, October 2001, p. 1,3. --- Fin de la cita --- i bien kn el citacion que hiciste  , no te kedo claro no se xk cambias aora de postura ???????????????? si partes de esa base , keda claro k se colocaron explosivos en las torres gemelas

dj reentry: oye yontroker en e video del pentagono no se ve ningun avion que se estrella simplemnte eso fue lso mismo estados unidos para derribar eso y tener alguna excusa

ink: --- Cita de: YONKOTROTER en 03/07/08, 13:14:27 pm ---i bien kn el citacion que hiciste  , no te kedo claro no se xk cambias aora de postura ???????????????? si partes de esa base , keda claro k se colocaron explosivos en las torres gemelas --- Fin de la cita --- yo no cambio de postura, pero tu dices que las torres se evaporaron eso es absurdo, el hormigon de polvorizo y los restos quedaron ahi, nada se evaporo. respecto al metal fundido no es algo "imposible", "ilogico" y que no tienen respuesta, pues si lo tienen y es que la respuesta es que se usaron explosivos de alta temperatura y ya esta, no ocurren cosas imposibles sin respuesta. http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=_lAeh-L5-EU

Navegación

 Índice de Mensajes

Página Siguiente

Página Anterior

Ir a la versión completa