| Miscelánea > OFF-TOPIC |
| ¿ Que opinais de la version OFICIAL del 11s ? |
| << < (32/108) > >> |
| toniphobia:
--- Cita de: chipo en 27/03/08, 22:34:19 pm ---es una serie de "ficcion" de k trata? pues de ke stados unidos es atacada por supuestos terroristas de corea, y poco a poco se va viendo como todo fue hecho desde dentro , donde una compañia controla al govierno, etc... xd es como el 11s pro en serie , sus la recomiendo --- Fin de la cita --- Habrá que verlo.. igualmente la realidad es ASÍ... y no desde ahora eh? SIEMPRE ha sido así... |
| YONKOTROTER:
para un niño esta bien para 1 persona con uso de cabeza es la mayor mentira desde que el hombre yego ala luna ...... claro esta otra mentira de eeuu |
| tHe HaRdCoRiAn:
YONKOTROTER, no se puede escribir con mayúsculas, por enésima vez. Este pase, pero siguientes mensajes, ni me molestaré en avisar :) |
| YONKOTROTER:
lo siento se me va la pinzaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! kereis saber la verdad del 11 s i del terrorismo que dicen k no afecta???? quereis saber por que los gobiernos de todo el mundo utilizan el terrorismo para crear miedo al pueblo ????????? aki os dejo 1 enlace que exo yo mismo con la ayuda de internet recopilando para gente que realmente este interesada en saber que paso el 11 s i en el terrorimo la nueva moda implantada por eeuu parlameto japones cuestiona 11 s http://es.youtube.com/results?search_query=PARLAMENTO%20JAPONES%20CUESTIONA%2011%20S&search=Search&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&spell=1 Aunque parezca increíble y el colmo de la manipulación mediática, el FBI estadounidense no persigue a Osama bin Laden, el principal sospechoso de los atentados del 11 de de septiembre en los EEUU. http://www.voltairenet.org/article155919.html movimiento por la verdad !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! esto lo puede hacer cualquier que tenga internet i ganas |
| ink:
aporto un documento de 43paginas escrito por cientificos que han investigado el colapso de las torres gemelas y del wtc7. http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/SEJonesWTCpaperSpanish62M.pdf Baker, Jeremy (2005). "Contrary to Popular (Mechanics’) Belief," Global Outlook, Issue 10, p. 14 (Spring-Summer 2005). Barnett, J. R., Biederman, R.R. and R.D. Sisson, Jr., "An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel from WTC Building 7," Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 53/12:18 (2001). Bazant, Z. P. and Zhou, Y. (2002). "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Simple Analysis," J. Eng. Mech. 128:2, January 2002. Bazant, Z. P. and Zhou, Y. (March 2002). "Addendum to ‘Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Simple Analysis," J. Eng. Mech. 128:369, March 2002. Bollyn, Christopher (2002). American Free Press, September 3, 2002, available at: http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic_.html. Chertoff, B., et al. (2005). "9/11: Debunking the Myths," Popular Mechanics, March 2005. Commission (2004). The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, Authorized Edition, New York: W.W. Norton. Cote, A. E., editor, Fire Protection Handbook 17th Edition, Quincy, Maine: National Fire Protection Association, 1992. De Grand Pre, Donn (2002). "Many Questions Still Remain About Trade Center Attack," American Free Press, February 3, 2002, available at: http://www.americanfreepress.net/02_03_02/Trade_Center_Attack/trade_center_attack.html Dwyer, James (2005). "City to Release Thousands of Oral Histories of 9/11 Today," New York Times, August 12, 2005, with quotes of eyewitnesses available in New York Times archives at http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histor ies_01.html and http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_h istories_full_01.html. Eagar, T. W. and Musso, C. (2001). "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation", Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 53/12:8- 11 (2001). FEMA (2002). "World Trade Center Building Performance Study," released May 2002, available at: http://www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm. Field, Andy (2004). "A Look Inside a Radical New Theory of the WTC Collapse," Fire/Rescue News, February 7, 2004. Available at http://cms.firehouse.com/content/article/article.jsp?sectionId=46&id=25807 Glanz, James (2001). "Engineers are baffled over the collapse of 7 WTC; Steel members have been partly evaporated," New York Times, November 29. 2001. Glanz, James, and Lipton, Eric (2002). "Towers Withstood Impact, but Fell to Fire, Report Says," Fri March 29, 2002, New York Times. Glover, Norman (2002). Fire Engineering journal, October 2002. Greening, Frank (2006), unpublished. Available at: http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf. Griffin, David Ray (2004). The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11, Northampton, Massachusetts: Interlink. Griffin, David Ray (2005). The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, Northampton, Massachusetts: Interlink. See also papers here: www.st911.org . Harris, Tom (2000). "How Building Implosions Work," available at: http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion.htm, ca. 2000. Hoffman, James (2005). "Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth," Global Outlook, Issue 10, p. 21 (Spring-Summer 2005). Hufschmid, Eric (2002). Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack, Goleta, California: Endpoint Software. Jones, S. E., et al. (2006). "Experiments Testing Greening’s Hypothesis Regarding Molten Aluminum," in preparation. Lane, B., and Lamont, S. (2005). "Arup Fire’s presentation regarding tall buildings and the events of 9/11," ARUP Fire, April 2005. Available at: http://www.arup.com/DOWNLOADBANK/download353.pdf Manning, William (2002). "Selling out the investigation," Editorial, Fire Engineering, January 2002. Manning, William (2004). "The Tainted Brush of 9/11 Politics," Editorial, Fire Engineering, September 2004. Meyer, Peter (2005). "Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11," http://serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm, March 2005. Mooney, Chris (2005). The Republican War on Science, New York, NY: Basic Books. NIST (2005). http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1Draft.pdf ("Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers (Draft)"), Sept.- Oct. 2005. NISTb (2005). http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20- %20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf (Part IIC — WTC 7 Collapse, preliminary), 2005. NOVA (2002). "Why the Towers Fell," originally broadcast Tuesday, April 30, 2002; see http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/. Parker, Dave (2005). "WTC investigators resist call for collapse visualisation," New Civil Engineer, October 6, 2005. Paul, Don, and Hoffman, Jim (2004). Waking Up From Our Nightmare : The 9/11/01 Crimes in New York City, San Francisco: Irresistible/Revolutionary. Penn Arts and Sciences (2002). Penn Arts and Sciences, summer 2002 , available at http://www.sas.upenn.edu/sasalum/newsltr/summer2002/k911.html. Risen, James (2001). "Secretive CIA Site in New York Was Destroyed on Sept. 11," New York Times, November 4, 2001. Ryan, Kevin (2004). Letter to Frank Gayle, available at http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451. Ryan, Kevin (2005). "A Call for a Personal Decision," Global Outlook, Issue 10, p. 96 (Spring- Summer 2005). See also papers here: www.st911.org . Swanson, Gail (2003). Behind the Scenes: Ground Zero, World Trade Center, September 11, 2001, New York: TRAC Team, Inc., 2003. Walsh, Trudy (2002), "Handheld APP eased recovery tasks," GCN, 9/11/02 issue. Williams, James (2001). "WTC a structural success," SEAU NEWS; The Newsletter of the Structural Engineers Association of Utah, October 2001, p. 1,3. |
| Navegación |
| Índice de Mensajes |
| Página Siguiente |
| Página Anterior |